Following a period of years where the
Spingold mostly started with a round of 64, in Toronto the number of entries
allowed the organisers to assign only two byes in the first round, meaning all
started with a proper round of 128. Therefore the two finalists arrived at the finish
after quite a long and tough journey.
LAVAZZA,
fielding their classic line-up (Bianchedi, Bilde, Bocchi, Duboin, Madala,
Sementa), had had a more difficult path than their counterpart, DIAMOND. This foursome
(Broegeland, Diamond, Lindqvist, Platnik, a new line-up after many years with
Hampson-Greco and Bathurst-Lall in it), had twice seen opponents concede before
the end of a match, and were never challenged on the way, while LAVAZZA had to overcome
strong opposition in two matches.
DIAMOND
started with a bang: after two dull hands, they piled up 25 IMPs in the next
two.
|
Board
3 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Madala |
Lindqvist |
Bianchedi |
Brogeland |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
2 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
2 NT by West |
|
Lead: ♦ 3 |
|
Down 2 — EW −200 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Diamond |
Bocchi |
Platnick |
Sementa |
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥!1 |
Pass |
|
4 ♣!2 |
Pass |
4 ♥!3 |
Pass |
|
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
1. ª 2. four ª and § control 3. transfer 4 ♠ by
West |
|
Made 4 — EW +620 |
Not much to be said:
Norberto Bocchi's decision to pass 2NT was totally reasonable, but proved
expensive when his counterpart decided to transfer, at the other
table, and declarer playing in 4ª guessed hearts
(following the obvious, but disastrous club lead from North): 13 IMPs. Immediately afterwards a defensive
problem.
|
Board
4 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Madala |
Lindqvist |
Bianchedi |
Brogeland |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣!1 |
2 NT!2 |
|
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
4 ♠ by
West |
|
Lead: ♣ A |
|
Down 1 — EW −100 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
Diamond |
Bocchi |
Platnick |
Sementa |
|
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
2 ♦1 |
Pass |
|
|
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
4 ♠ by
West |
|
Made 4 — EW +620 |
Both North’s led the §A, and
saw partner's 3 - in both cases, the order of priority in carding was: reverse
count, low encouraging, suit preference
- then had to decide how to continue. Up to you now.
Bocchi cashed another club, while Lindqvist switched to diamonds. Better the Norwegian, who had the big advantage of knowing his partner had diamonds.
|
Board
4 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madala won the Ace,
cashed the ªA getting good news, and got to hand with a spade to finesse in
hearts. Down one.
Diamond
ruffed, played two rounds of spades and he too played a heart towards the Jack.
The difference was that Sementa was endplayed, having only minor cards left! 12
IMPs.
Three flat hands followed, then LAVAZZA turned the match upside down in the second half of the segment.
4 IMPs to start, thanks to a standard underpointed
opening bid by the two Americans, quite typical in modern USA bridge, especially
for Precision players. Sometime they prove to be expensive, but some other
offer good dividends. This
time it was a loser.
|
Board
8 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Madala |
Lindqvist |
Bianchedi |
Brogeland |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
|
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
|
All pass |
|
|
|
|
2 ♠ by
North |
|
Lead: ♣ 2 |
|
Down 1 — NS −50 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Diamond |
Bocchi |
Platnick |
Sementa |
|
1 ♦! |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
|
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
3 NT by East |
|
Lead: ♠ 6 |
|
Down 2 — EW −100 |
Then 8 IMPs more, thanks to accurate system
preparation by the "LAVAZZA boys".
|
Board
9 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Madala |
Lindqvist |
Bianchedi |
Brogeland |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
|
2 ♦1 |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
4 ♥ by
East |
|
Lead: ♠ A |
|
Made 4 — EW +620 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Diamond |
Bocchi |
Platnick |
Sementa |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦!1 |
|
2 ♦!2 |
2 ♥!3 |
4 ♥ |
5 ♣ |
|
Dbl |
All pass |
|
|
|
1. 5+
(0r 4441) unbalanced 2. majors 3. clubs 5 ♣× by
South |
|
Lead: ♥ 3 |
|
Down 2 — NS −300 |
The two Norwegians did not have the right tool to defend against the opponents' overcall, but the Italians did.
Two almost flat deals followed (1 IMP to
LAVAZZA in board 12), quite uninteresting, then 4 IMPs to DIAMOND.
|
Board
12 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Madala |
Lindqvist |
Bianchedi |
Brogeland |
|
1 ♠ |
Dbl |
2 ♠1 |
Pass |
|
Pass |
Dbl |
Rdbl2 |
3 ♦ |
|
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
3 ♠ by
West |
|
Lead: ♥ A |
|
Down 1 — EW −50 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Diamond |
Bocchi |
Platnick |
Sementa |
|
1 ♠ |
Dbl |
2 ♠!1 |
3 ♦ |
|
Pass |
4 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
1.
weaker
raise 4 ♣ by
North |
|
Lead: ♠ 8 |
|
Down 1 — NS −100 |
Sementa's aggressive style pushed NS too high in the closed room, and so inevitably happened in the other room as well.
However, before the siren LAVAZZA placed a
terrible "one-two".
|
Board
13 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Madala |
Lindqvist |
Bianchedi |
Brogeland |
|
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
|
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
|
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
|
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
4 ♠ by
East |
|
Lead: ♣ Q |
|
Made 4 — EW +620 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Diamond |
Bocchi |
Platnick |
Sementa |
|
|
Pass |
1 ♣!1 |
Pass |
|
1 ♦!2 |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
|
2 ♦!3 |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
|
2 ♠!4 |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
1. 16+ 2. negative 3. puppet
to 2© 4. a
better raise than an immediate 2ª 4 ♠ by
East |
|
Lead: ♣ Q |
|
Down 1 — EW −100 |
In
its first steps the hand developed in an identical way: §Q to the Ace (small stylistic difference:
Bianchedi ditched the ¨Q, and Platnik the ©10; better the Italian-Argentine, I believe,
who spread some fog around), ©9 to South's King and another club, ruffed
by East. Here the two paths diverged. The American continued with a small
spade, and the defense didn't have any problem in giving him trouble: a further
club followed, and declarer, badly reading the situation, lost trump control.
In fact, Platnik played another spade, while to get home he should have stopped,
cashing his red winners first instead of drawing trumps... In the other
room, Bianchedi tabled the ªK, and this convinced Brogeland to
duck. There was then no longer the option to fatally force East: 12 IMPs to
LAVAZZA.
DIAMOND
was still ahead 29-25, but Diamond-Platnik’s habit of aggressiveness proved to
be very expensive once again on the following deal.
|
Board
14 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Madala |
Lindqvist |
Bianchedi |
Brogeland |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
|
1 ♣!1 |
Dbl |
1 ♦!2 |
2 ♥ |
|
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
3 NT by North |
|
Lead: ♣ 5 |
|
Made 6 — NS +490 |
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
Diamond |
Bocchi |
Platnick |
Sementa |
|
|
|
2 ♥ |
Pass |
|
Pass |
Dbl |
Pass |
Pass |
|
Rdbl |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
|
Pass |
Dbl |
All pass |
|
|
2 ♠× by
East |
|
Lead: ♠ K |
|
Down 5 — EW −1100 |
Without the trump lead EW could have escaped cheaply - after a diamond, declarer can cross-ruff the first six tricks winning 5 IMPs - but Sementa brilliantly tabled the ªK, and the result was down 5, 1100 and 12 further IMPs to LAVAZZA, who, after a dull hand, went into the changing room ahead by 8, 37-29.